翻訳と辞書 ・ Los Angeles mayoral election, 1915 ・ Los Angeles mayoral election, 1917 ・ Los Angeles mayoral election, 1919 ・ Los Angeles mayoral election, 1921 ・ Los Angeles mayoral election, 1923 ・ Los Angeles mayoral election, 1925 ・ Los Angeles mayoral election, 1929 ・ Los Angeles mayoral election, 1933 ・ Los Angeles mayoral election, 1937 ・ Los Angeles mayoral election, 1938 ・ Los Angeles mayoral election, 1941 ・ Los Angeles mayoral election, 1945 ・ Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association ・ Los Angeles County Federation of Labor ・ Los Angeles County Fire Department ・ Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. ・ Los Angeles County Flood of 2005 ・ Los Angeles County Hall of Records ・ Los Angeles County High School for the Arts ・ Los Angeles County Lifeguards ・ Los Angeles County Medical Association ・ Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ・ Los Angeles County Museum ・ Los Angeles County Museum of Art ・ Los Angeles County Office of Public Safety ・ Los Angeles County Probation Department ・ Los Angeles County Public Defender ・ Los Angeles County Raceway ・ Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk ・ Los Angeles County Sales Tax, Measure R (2008)
|
|
Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. : ウィキペディア英語版 | Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
''Los Angeles County Flood Control Dist. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (2013)'' is a United States Supreme Court case, in which the Natural Resources Defense Council and Santa Monica Baykeeper challenged the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (District) for violating the terms of its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit as shown in water quality measurements from monitoring stations within the Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/los-angeles-county-flood-control-district-v-national-resources-defense-council/ )〕 The Supreme Court, by a unanimous 9-0 vote, reversed and remanded the Ninth Circuit's ruling on the grounds that the flow of water from an improved portion of a navigable waterway into an unimproved portion of the same waterway does not qualify as a "discharge of a pollutant" under the Clean Water Act. ==Parties==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|